All societies have their own epic creation stories.
High science's "scientific" creation story is based on spectacular, 2 million year old river cobble stone tools recovered by Louis and Mary Leakey deep in an ancient East African river gorge back in the 1950s.
That's four of them below in an official British museum photo
HIGH SCIENCE'S PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT OF ITS SPECIAL CREATION STORY OF ALL MANKIND IN 1966
This ad appeared in Nov 1966 Nat. Geo. magazine promoting a National Geographic TV special announcing the discovery of the "Dawn of Man".
STRANGELY CROCODILE STOMACH STONES ARE INDISTINGUISHABLE IN EVERY DETAIL FROM THE 2 MILLION YEAR OLD HOMINID STONE TOOLS THAT MADE LOUIS AND MARY LEAKEY WORLD FAMOUS BACK IN THE 1950S
Crocodiles have the curious habit of swallowing rocks.
The bigger the croc --- The bigger the rocks.
Back 2 million years ago Olduvai Gorge was loaded with crocs.
Mommy! Mommy!! Why are you puking your stomach stones (gastroliths) out on the hot sands of your basking site?
Why honey, that's so 2.6 million years from now, Dr. Timothy White from UC anthropology can come along and find them and publish them as 2.6 million year old hominid stone tools in top journals like Science, Nature and The National Geographic.
Below --- 100 million year old dinosaur (plesiosaur) stomach stones no different than Oldowan stone tools above. These are from Kansas.
The Plesiosauris is a carnivorous marine dinosaur with feeding habits similar to the crocodile.
Plesiosaur stomach stones range in size from that of a walnut to about 4 inches across
You can see for yourself below that these published 'dawn of man' Oldowan river cobble stone tools also range in size from about that of a walnut to about 4 inches.
Photo: Mary Leakey in (Olduvai Gorge, Excavations in beds I & II, 1960 --- 1963, Cambridge University Press 1971,) "Plate 25. BK. Subspheroids."
In 1960 legendary UC Berkeley anthropologist Sherwood Washburn wrote:
"These primitive river cobble stone tools are made up of chips and pebbles, usually from river gravels. Many have not been shaped at all, and they can be identified as tools only because they appear in concentrations along with a few worked pieces, in locations where no such stones occur naturally."
It’s a big joke.
Mary Leakey faithfully cataloguing 1.8 million year old dawn of man Oldowan, river cobble stone tools.
Nat. Geo photo. Nov. 1966.
Those are crocodile stomach stones on that table folks.
A Goddam fool ought to be able to see that!!!
I had always been a little skeptical of the Oldowan industry from the first time I saw a picture of one many years ago but who am I to question the experts.
The fateful moment came one Tuesday morning, when, as I always do on Tuesday mornings, walked down to the corner Chevron station and picked up a copy of the New York Times for the special Science page which appears there every Tuesday.
I noticed there was a review of a book entitled ‘You Belong in a Zoo’ by Peter Brazaitis, the retired chief of New York City's Central Park Zoo.
It said: “Crocodiles, like birds, swallow rocks.”
It said: Scientists working in Uganda had shown that crocodiles always swallowed stones equivalent to 1 percent of their body weight.
Curious to see how they managed that as they grew, Brazaitis put three baby crocodiles in a stone filled pond. X rays showed that, overnight, they swallowed about 1 percent each. Then he let them grow for a year in a stoneless pond, and finally put the heaviest in with stones so big that it could not swallow one one without going well over one percent. The next morning not only had the right weight in new stones been eaten, but the crocodile had regurgitated some of the old stones. Brazaitis was quoted as saying, "The crocodile had made change. Lets see a bird do that."
The second I read that word 'regurgitate' I knew exactly what to do. I went out and enrolled in a class in website design.
The entire hominid stone tool idea is predicated on one single fact. That the soft stone free sands of Olduvai river banks bore no natural stones of their own and any stones found there had to have been moved from distant river beds by some unknown living 'transporter' whom the biggest names of anthropology claim could only be that little old tool maker 'Homo habilis'.
The crocodile is an indiscriminate swallower of hard objects including stones, tree knots, coins, glass and in captivity, much else. It swallows stones of many sizes and all configurations.
There's no escaping it --- every one of those swallowed and transported stones still have to be precisely in the exact place the crocodiles left them 2 million years ago and that could only be along extinct Olduvai Gorge stream and lake margins for that is the only place the crocodile can exist and the only place river cobble stone tools have been found so far.
Crocodiles live and die glued to the water's edge, that's what got them through the great extinction.
The crocodile is the ultimate transporter. It must have transported stones numbering in the trillions upon trillions faithfully and with certainty for more than 240 million years.
Nat Geo. photo
Look closely at the map below.
The figure above is an imaginative scientific reconstruction of the archaeological setting of 2 million year old archaeological sites at Lake Rudolph East Africa drawn by archaeologists working there in the 1960s. The setting is a floodplain with all the little Xs indicating presumed Oldowan river and lake side hominid tool use sites. (Note the lake shore on the far left).
In the map above it can be seen that the biggest names of Berkeley anthropology, mistakenly believing they were studying archaeological remains from the creation event of all mankind have instead unwittingly made a perfect map of the distribution of 2 million year old riverside crocodile basking, regurgitation and crap zones in the Lake Rudolph Basin, Ethiopia.
Kind of like convincing yourself you've found the cross of Jesus at a swap meet in Albuquerque
(Map above from 'Earliest Man and Environments in the Lake Rudolph Basin', Univ. Chicago Press, 1976, Pg. 535.)
SITE MAP OF A RECENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIG IN OLDUVAI GORGE
Red arrows are mine. They show streams flowing into extinct 2 million year old fluctuating lake shore in Olduvai Gorge.
Virtually all river cobble stone tools were recovered from these lake and stream junctions.
RECENT ARCHAEOLOGISTS DUG 11 TRENCHES DESIGNATED BY THE LITTLE SQUARES SHOWN IN THE INSET. YOU CAN SEE FOR YOURSELF THAT THE INVESTIGATORS TARGETED THE TRENCHES PRECISELY INTO THE FLUCTUATING SHORELINES FOR THEY KNEW IN ADVANCE THAT'S THE ONLY PLACE RIVER COBBLE STONE TOOLS COULD BE EXPECTED --- DIRECTLY ON THE SHORELINES WHERE THE CROCODILES SUNBATHED DAILY OVER A 45,000 YEAR PERIOD.
CROCS CAN LEAVE A HEAP OF STOMACH STONES OVER 45,000 YEARS.
Map from: (Blumenschine et. al., Science 21 Feb 2003 vol 29 pg 1218)
MAP OF ETHIOPIAN SITE THAT PROVIDED THE INSPIRATION FOR SCIENCE'S SPECIAL CREATION STORY OF ALL MANKIND
(1) 2.5 MILLION YEAR OLD LAKE
(2) 2.5 MILLION YEAR OLD FLOODPLAIN
(3) HISTORICALLY EXPOSED 2.5 MILLION YEAR OLD RIVER CHANNELS
(4) EXCAVATIONS INTO 2.5 MILLION YEAR OLD RIVERSIDE BEACH SANDS
This professionally published map above shows 2.5 million year old river channels sites on an exposed mudflat at Koobi Fora, Ethiopia.
The numbers denote total number of stones collected from the stream channels.
All stones were collected from within the stream channels and nowhere else.
The Nile crocodile dwelt in the exact same stream channels. If you keep digging long enough and hard enough in relict beach sands where the Nile crocodile once dwelt you’re certain to encounter relict crocodile stomach stones there --- THERE’S NO ESCAPING IT.
Map from Isaac, G. L. Science 173 1129-1134 (1971).
Mary Leakey proposed a kit of hominid made tools made up of different physical attributes of the stones, each type designed for a separate utilitarian purpose, cutting, scraping, drilling or pounding etc. The ability to manufacture tool kits was considered evidence of a considerable leap in advanced neural circuitry of the supposed lttle old toolmaker H. habilis.
Nicholas Toth later reassessed M. Leakey’s interpretations, categorizing the spheroids and polyhedrons as mere hammerstones leaving only the flakes as true butchering tools of the Oldowan river cobble industry.
This reassessment is now firm scientific dogma.
Below: specially selected Oldowan river cobble stones deemed "hammerstones" by Nicholas Toth.
The official paleontological standard for identification of dinosaur stomach stones is that the specimens must show wear on outer ridges of the stones but none in the depressions (indicating the wear occurred from abrasive grinding in an energetic stomach as opposed to pounding against another rock.)
Above, we see wear on the outer ridges but none in the depressions telling us the above wear occurred through grinding --- not battering (the crocodile has a highly energetic stomach). If the above were hammerstones evidence of battering would be distributed more evenly across the stone in the depressions as well as on the ridges.
Photo: Mary Leakey in (Olduvai Gorge, Excavations in beds I & II, 1960 --- 1963, Cambridge University Press 1971,)"Plate 19. Spheroids and subspheroids."
If The Oldowan stone tool industry were a movie instead of high scientific dogma it would have a title something like: Abbott and Costello Meet the Three Stooges Out at the Mummies Tomb.
Now, we will show that it was the hippopotamus who shaped all those flakes and the crocodile who transported them.
Hippos and crocodiles live and die together, glued cooperatively to the water’s edge. The Modern hippopotamus is the world’s third largest animal; the male weighing up to 4 tons.
(THERE WERE MUCH LARGER MONSTER HIPPOS AT ANCIENT OLDUVAI GORGE). (Hippopotamus gorgops,)
Hippo spends most of its daylight hours wallowing in shallow water then coming out of the water in the evening for a night of riverside grazing.
American archaeologists Lopinot and Roy, working in the American west were faced with the problem of differentiating natural from early American proto-tool specimens that could be either natural geofacts or cultural flakes of the very early Clovis culture of North America.
The (Lopinot and Ray 2007) suspected the pre-Clovis specimens were not artifacts but were formed by trampling of large mammals visiting the site repeatedly during the Pleistocene. Given that mastodons were present when the late Pleistocene deposits were formed they decided to use Asian elephants as a proxy for the mastodons and created a replicative trampling experiment. The experiment involved approximately 4,333 pebbles and cobbles collected from the Big Eddy river gravels. These specimens were closely inspected to insure none were flaked or otherwise modified then placed in a hand-excavated plastic lined pit measuring 1.5 m in length, 1.0 m in width, and 6-8 cm in depth. Two elephants in tandem, led by handlers were trod over the gravel a total of 50 times, with two feet of the elephant normally hitting the gravel with each round. After this, it was found that 232 flakes and 40 angular fragments were produced. These experimentally modified flakes were remarkably similar to the flake specimens found in the Pre-Clovis-age deposits.
Above: flakes produced in elephant trampling experiment.
If three Asian elephants in Missouri today can easily produce proto-flakes simply by stepping upon a small test pit 50 times it becomes reasonable to expect large herds of hippos might be expected to produce immense numbers over the many eons they’ve been around.
THESE PUBLISHED FLAKES OF THE OLDOWAN RIVER COBBLE INDUSTRY ARE INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM THE FLAKES PRODUCED IN THE LOPINOT AND RAY ASIAN ELEPHANT EXPERIMENT IN THE FIGURE ABOVE IT
The hippo’s constant companion, the crocodile, would happily swallow many of these zoofacts inevitably transporting them to many diverse basking sites.
The hippopotamus makes the perfect riverside trample stone manufacturer --- the crocodile the perfect transporter.
THE BIGGEST FOOLS OF UC ANTHRO SEARCHING FOR HOMINID STONE TOOLS IN THE LOWER LEVELS OF OLDUVAI GORGE TANZANIA
Science, it now seems, needs a new special creation story of all mankind.
You can get the Supreme Court --- the Pope --- the joints chief of staff and God himself could write it in the sky with a magic marker and nobody --- not even god can turn those sorry specimens Mary and Louis Leakey pulled out of the lower levels of Olduvai Gorge into anything other than what they are --- crap --- ordinary, common crocodile crap.
Now --- The True Creation Story of All Mankind.
Mosquitoes are considered one of the most lethal organisms in the world due to the fact that they transmit an enormous number of pathogens (viruses, protozoans, nematodes, bacteria including, of course Plasmodium falciparum)
A stinking Goddam little parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, the parasite responsible for that most deadly of all human diseases, malaria, is the most likely true creator of all modern humans. If not falciparum, then some other ancient parasite.
Parasites have the nasty habit of invading and driving the nervous systems of their unlucky hosts. We have been living with an unrelenting all powerful army of mosquito borne parasites since the beginning of hominid history. We will show here how a million year epic struggle with unknown mosquito parasites has been the evolutionary driving force leading to all modern humans
It happened so far back in time we actually don’t know which specific parasite was involved but for simplicities sake it helps to think of a single microparsite that infected only human hosts for a long stable period of time leading up to a time when the host population shrank to very small size lost out in the desert vastness of East Africa between about 65,000 and 75,000 years ago during a 10,000 year period of African desertification wherein the host (us) was locked into a period of dangerous inbreeding through progressive loss of diversity.
We will call this unknown, ancient microparasite, 'Plasmo'. Makes it easier to write and visualize.
I believe in God. I believe God speaks directly to people. I believe God also speaks through people. I believe God answers prayers. I believe God can and does fuck with my brain. I believe God is revengeful and can quickly burn my ass for so little as a minor, unseemly, out of place, innocent, fucking little comment but I also believe with all my piss and all my vinegar that a stinking Goddam little parasite is or was my true and honest Goddam, maker.
Not a preternatural super being. Not natural selection. Not a selfish gene. No blind watchmaker. No Goddam R.A.Fisher or J.B.S. Haldane evolutionary horse shit. Surely as shit no Goddam John Maynard Smith crappy assed algebraic puke. Not optimal foraging theory and Goddam, Goddam, Goddam sure no silly ass Goddam academic wet dream called 'game theory' or anything fucking nearly like it.
Plasmo was my true and honest Goddam maker.
The war between parasites and their hosts' immune defenses has been likened to a molecular arms race. The truth is that few parasites are deadly to their hosts. In the long run the microbes have a shared interest in the hosts survival. A dead host is a dead end for the invader too.
Parasites have long been known to influence their host’s behavior in ways beneficial to the parasite. They have the nasty habit of invading, taking over and controlling the host's nervous system and then driving the host to bizarre self destructive behavior. Once the nervous system is in the parasites control parasites affect their hosts profoundly, determining how they look, their mating behavior, where they live, what they eat.
The rabies virus, for instance, makes its victims rabid so they bite others in order to continue transmission of the virus.
Black Protomognathus ants enslave red Leptothorax ants, which work and feed the larvae of the black ants while their masters hunt for more slaves.
Trematode worms are capable of manipulating the behavior of their hosts the mud snail. Trematode larvae must find a way into the digestive system of a beach flea and thence into the digestive system of a bird to complete its lifecycle. The problem is the mud snail and the beach flea do not exist in the same habitat so in some miraculous way the larvae consume the mud snail's glands and somehow drive the snail to the fleas habitat.
Biologists have discovered and hope to decipher deadly cross talk between the genomes of a grasshopper and a parasitic worm that infects it.
The interaction occurs as the worm induces the grasshopper to seek out a large body of water and then leap into it.
The parasite known as a hairworm, lives and breeds in fresh water. But spends the early part of its life cycle eating away the innards of the grasshoppers and crickets it infects.
When it is fully grown, it faces a difficult problem, that of returning to the water. So it has evolved a clever way of influencing its host to deliver just one further service --- the stricken grasshopper looks for water and dives in.
The nervous system of the grasshopper is zombified when the hairworm injects two proteins into the brain of its host that influences development of the grasshopper nervous system. Although produced by the worm, the two proteins are similar to the insect proteins so as to mimic them.
These proteins seem to induce a fantastical desire to swim. It is not known how, from its aquatic home, the hairworm manages to infect a terrestrial species but it is thought the hairworm larvae, miniscule on hatching, first infect a mosquito larvae and hide as cists in their tissues.
When the adult mosquito flies away and dies its body may be eaten by a grasshopper or cricket. The hairworm will then develop eating everything not essential to keep its host alive until the zombified grasshopper is reduced to just its head legs and outer skeleton and goes for its final swim.
(SOME OF ABOVE FROM NAT. GEO AND NICHOLAS WADE NY TIMES. LOST DATE SORRY).
Turn on a dime evolution
Beginning about 80,000 years ago and ending about 50 000 years ago our ancestors underwent a population squeeze where they went from possibly one hundred thousand to about five or ten thousand individuals placing them in the position of a critically endangered species perilously close to complete extinction. This is known from genetic studies which preserve genetic records of population expansions and separations in the distant past. This evidence suggests that all living human populations evolved from a very isolated precursor population probably experiencing severe evolutionary stress.
Early human populations were extremely small in size burdened with excessively long generation times which were critical to the maturation of the young.
Such very small populations are disastrously unstable due to lack of genetic variation and intense inbreeding. On their own they would soon collapse. Plasmo could turn on a dime like an Olympic downhill racer while the human populations could only react like the lumbering Titanic evading an iceberg.
Microbial populations may fluctuate by factors of 10 billion on a daily cycle as they move between hosts, or as they encounter antibiotics, antibodies or other natural hazards. A simple comparison of the pace of evolution between microbes and their multicellular hosts (us in this case) suggests a million fold or billion fold advantage to the microbe. A year in the life of bacteria would easily match the span of mammalian evolution"
It would have been impossible for the incipient humans to keep up with the continually ongoing environmental changes. Plasmo had to do it for us. She had the speed. She had the numbers. She had to come up with something.
To save us plasmo invented the computer 65,000 years before Alan Turing was even born.
It has been demonstrated that computers can come in a diversity of sizes, that computers can be composed of biological components. The human brain is an example of that.
For generations scientists have been inventing new materials and designs for stuffing ever more circuit components into ever less space. How about going in the opposite direction? How about larger? How about a computer as big as the Great Basin?
To save us Plasmo turned the entire human population --- not the individual --- into a computer as big as the Great Basin.
Tiny populations whose daily interactions, desires, fears, lusts, longings, constant dissatisfactions and insatiable yearning for more, more, more, perform functions analogous to those of the transistors, diodes, conductors and other key components of today's microprocessors only spread out on a desert landscape as big as the Great Basin.
We propose an evolved prehistoric macroprocessor going back maybe 50 000 to 65 000 thousand years ago in which certain small groups of individuals took on the properties, transistors, sensors, searchers, switches and routers all together making up the components of a giant computer designed by Plasmo to drive individuals to and from any part of the landscape Plasmo wished them to go and to do there what all human populations do so readily anywhere, to screw and screw and screw and screw.
Female fuckability and unfuckability (ugliness and prettiness) would be the ones and zeros of a binary code acting upon a bar code reader in the brain of the male. A barcode reader exactly alike in all human males connected to a solenoid in the male's brain that fired each and every time a today's male sees a pretty young female on the street, in the market, or in passing autos.
The 400, 000 square miles of Western America we think of as the Great Basin, including all of Nevada, portions of Oregon, Idaho, California, Arizona and New Mexico is the kind of area we are thinking about, only in Africa. A vast desert area some 65 000 years ago when the Africa was beginning this period of ever increasing desertification within which our precursor hominids would have had to survive in ever smaller groups leading to a period of an overall human population of perhaps no more than 10 000 individuals (maybe 2,000 some say) distributed as small semi--isolated groups struggling in cruel, unrelenting, desert. A dire biological recipe for certain extinction.
Ernst Mayr's Theory of Peripatric Speciation
Ernst Mayr is well known in the world of biology. His evolutionary concept of peripatric speciation, describes a unique kind of speciation event different from total geographical isolation.
Emanating from his work on Solomon island birds in the 1920s Ernst Mayr has contributed the concept of peripatric speciation to evolutionary theory. His work there had impressed upon him the importance of geographic isolation as a precondition to speciation. In analyzing specimens, he had been struck by an interesting pattern. The most physically distinctive or divergent members of a species, those that differed most in dramatically in beak shape for instance lived on the edge of the species range. It was his idea that the most important evolutionary events took place in such peripherally isolated populations.
Because population size at the center of the range is greater gene flow also becomes greater but it is also multidimensional. That is, like the arms of an octopus migration routes extend out from the larger central populations. This leads to populations with high genetic variability and thus, high levels of hetrosygosity (a kind of genetic variation).
Conversely gene flow is generally much lower in the widely separated peripheral populations where genetic variation is reduced, and because of inbreeding, higher levels of homozygosity (fewer genetic choices) would prevail. Populations inhabiting peripheral ranges would be faced with adapting simultaneously to two environments, one genetic and one ecological.. One might expect that this double impact of high rates of genetic drift and simultaneous environmental pressure might trigger rapid changes.
However Mayr felt that drift and environmental pressure could not supply the complete answer, he believed "quantum evolution" was initiated on the edge of the species range.
"The genetic reorganization of peripherally isolated populations, on the other hand, does not permit evolutionary changes that are many times more rapid than the changes within populations that are part of a continuous system. Here then is a mechanism which would permit the rapid emergence of macroevolutionary novelties without any conflict with the observed facts of genetics."
Those are exactly the evolutionary properties Plasmo was looking for --- quantum evolution and 'rapid emergence of novelties'. to save both herself and her small, ever shrinking, lumbering, critically threatened hominid population.
The size of the population is decisive in the speed of drift. When populations are small, the speed of drift is high and can often differ greatly from one generation to the next.
TOP LINE SHOWS RANDOM GENETIC DRIFT IN A FAIRLY LARGE POPULATION WHICH CAN GO ON FOREVER.
BOTTOM LINE SHOWS RANDOM GENETIC DRIFT IN A VERY SMALL POPULATION WHICH CAN DRIFT GENES COMPLETELY IN OR COMPLETELY OUT OF EXISTENCE IN VERY SHORT ORDER.
To produce a stable over all population Plasmo needed to move those peripheral genes to the center of the species range ASAP.
Map of Mayr's population distribution of a single species (Papuan kingfishers) on New Guinea. He wrote that this distribution was characteristic of hundreds of other species.
Numbers 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 above denote the smaller outer islands. Vast desert areas such as the great Basin would harbor many similar tiny, semi isolated human populations. However humans must walk from site to site, not fly as birds do.
Think of it as amperage. High amperage for birds. Low amperage for humans.
This became a major problem of gene flow velocity that Plasmo had to resolve if she wanted to save our collective asses 65,000 years ago.
To marry the periphery to the core of those beleaguered hominid populations the energetic Plasmo invented the garment industry 65,000 years before Calvin Klein ever even knew how to sew a button on a pair of men's genes.
Plasmo had to come up with something to draw the core individuals out to the farthest reaches of the species range to leave genes and bring back young females and marry the drift of the periphery to the variation of the core populations thus insuring healthy genetic variation in the entire endangered population.
Plasmo briefly took over the incipient humans nervous systems and invented economic systems, long distance trade and particularly fashion and the garment industry to trade out and marry the swiftness and drift of Ernst Mayr's periphery to the unidirectional variation of the species range core of our then genetically crunched ancestors.
If there's anything in the world that can move genes around consistently over long distances it's style, fashion and the well known human eternal search for more, more and more. Plasmo invented that.
Plasmo invented commerce and long distance trade because she knew that wherever you find commerce and long distance trade a whole lot first class screwing always goes along with it.
In the beginning it was just a lousy little bit of body paint, some pretty feathers, cave bear fangs, furs, skins, sea shells for beads. To make this mechanism effective Plasmo invented the base drive in all modern humans to keep the body continuously decorated and adorned with all the gewgaws. WHETHER THEY USED COCONUT SHELLS, BEADS, SCARAFICATIONS OR DIAMONDS, THEY ALL SIGNIFY THE SAME THING ... VALUE. Actually, nothing but useless but rare junk. The kind of stuff you'd have to go way out on the periphery of the landscape to get a hold of and keep circulating relentlessly unabated for the past 65,000 years.
That's the Goddam computer dummy. The garment industry is the operating system. The garment industry spread out over a landscape as big as the Great Basin keeps genes moving like nothing else can. Nothing can keep genes circulating eternally across the landscape like the lust for fashion. THAT'S THE COMPUTER DUMMY. Only the inherent mathematics of the garment industry (value) could insure long distance, high velocity gene flow over a landscape as big as the Great Basin on a regular and consistent schedule. Paint, beads, bones and cave bear teeth at the beginning --- diamonds and rubies today --- all just useless, prettified but valuable junk.
For the ants and bees it’s chemicals that glues them together. For us, it’s economics, trade, art, style and the garment industry. The garment industry is as much a part of us as our belly buttons, assholes, internal organs, noses and toes and its been that way for the last 65,000 years or so that Plasmo first came up with it.
At some point the ever thinking Plasmo needed something to amplify current across the surface of the Monster, magnum macroprocessor. She chose the bead.
The bead has value. The bead is a value sink responded to by all individuals in the population. It has been thus from the beginning. Historians speculate that one reason Julius Caeser invaded Britain in 55 B.C. was to get his hands on freshwater pearls. There have to be circuits in the brain for something like that to prevail so many years in so many diverse human populations.
Trade one bead or a feather over a very long distance and you're almost certainly going to send a gene or two along with it. One might almost say one bead equals one gene in a long distance business transaction.
For prehistoric humans that could only be accomplished by aggressive consistent foot travel from core to periphery over very long distances. The bead helped insure that male traders got out to the edge of the species range regularly and aggressively in a consistent manner like ants relentlessly finding their way out on to some very specific spot on the sidewalk to devour a tiny lump of sweets some careless human has dropped there.
Art has a value. Art is a value sink. There have to be circuits in the brain for that too.
There is an inseparable connection between art and money. Art is a business pure and simple. Art was a value storage device then and remains a value storage device to this day. Art like the bead is a value storage device that can be understood by every member of the population. Who do think held on to the best art in the earliest human populations. Why the rich and the powerful; then as today. Nothing has changed. Art is locked into the circuits of our brains as a value sink.
Art and the bead were the first money in a value system that had no numbers yet every member of the population understood that value and kept it in their heads.
Art and the bead were only the carrot and stick to draw the young males out to the periphery. There had to be circuits for the brain to do that. Plasmo invented those circuits to draw males out to the edge of the species range to trade for art and the bead where it was often and cheap and then in an accompanying behavior bring young females back to the center of the species range to keep the genetic makeup of the entire species vital.
In art Plasmo had invented money without knowing it. Art was the progenitor to all money. Today money has replaced art and the bead as the value sink of all time.
FUCKABILITY AND UNFUCKABILITY AS A TRANSISTOR FOR THE COMPUTER AS BIG AS THE GREAT BASIN.
In this computer you need a transistor. You need a gate.
The gate would be fuckabilirty and unfuckability of the female form and face.
The more prettiness in the population the faster the gene flow. The more dog shit ugliness, the slower the gene flow ---that's a computer part, a regulator , a transistor, a gate --- Plasmo invented it. It's how Plasmo regulated gene flow.
In a computer you need something to control current --- resistors, capacitors and transistors. All a transistor does is control and moderate the flow of electricity. Female fuckability and unfuckability controlled gene flow for that human population highly stressed out on a desert vastness in East Africa 65,000 years ago. The more beauty the faster the gene flow. The more dog shit ugliness the slower the gene flow. That's your computer.
Think about it as a configuration red and green stop lights where under certain conditions the traffic flows through and under other conditions, the traffic doesn’t flow through.
Most southern California freeway onramps have a green and a red light which go on and off to meter traffic onto the freeway. It’s all set up so only so many cars can get through at any given time. In the monster macroprocessor dog shit female ugliness performed the same function red lights perform on the freeway onramps in Southern California. Breath taking beauty and big fat asses simply regulated traffic.
Fuckability/unfuckability of the female as a computer gate was created in three ways. Ugliness/prettiness of the face, oldness/youngness and fatness/thinness of the entire body all combined in each small population. All this as a distinct genetic component as yet undreamed of by modern biology.
Plasmo used breath taking beauty and dog shit ugliness combined with the bead to regulate the velocity, the distance and the direction of gene flow in the monster magnum macroprocessor.
The law of gravity that makes apples fall on earth are the same everywhere in the cosmos. This principle was critical to the Ideas of Newton, Galileo and Einstein.
This same principle is not applicable to the inner workings of the human brain. The male can no more make a pretty face ugly or an ugly face pretty than he can force his brain to switch perception of red to green or green to blue. This response is an experience of molecular structures of the human brain and nowhere else in the cosmos.
Anthropology teaches each society sets its own standard for beauty. This is asinine for the overt heterosexual male finds beauty in all human populations --- just ask any sailor. The truth is that all human populations produce individuals who range from breathtaking beauty to downright ugliness.
Any gathering on Earth, in an elevator, an airplane or classroom - in any such group there is always one prettiest and one ugliest woman. The group is divided up in a number of different way ways simultaneously, old/young, fat/thin, pretty/ugly, presenting continuous range of variation to the eye of every heterosexual male in the system.
The point we are trying to make is that facial beauty is not universal in the cosmos the way the law of gravity is. Facial beauty can only be read by a genetically created molecular structure of some sort in the male brain
That structure must act like a barcode reader connected to a solenoid which evinces an immediate sense of longing deep in the male's guts if the female is pretty and the opposite if the female is ugly. This physical brain structure identical in every male whether he wants it or not. It comes to us as if produced by a high speed printing press without variation throughout all human populations.
It is a biological structure probably comprised of circuits and those circuits are part of a wire harness similar to the wire harness in my ranger pick up that is identical in all ranger pick ups. That structure in my pick up truck turns on the dome light unerringly and faithfully each time I open the truck door and unfailingly turns it off when I close the door. It never tires or fails or misfires.
The barcode reader works the exact opposite of the Pavlovian response. It is automatic. It never needs to be initiated or reinforced. It is given to us at birth. It never fails to read breath taking beauty or dog shit ugliness perfectly and faithfully each time a new young woman is seen, on the street, in the market or in passing autos.
That's brain science folks. Hard ass brain science. You can't read dog shit ugliness and big fat asses as a negative response without a circuit in the brain to do it. A barcode reader connected to a solenoid in the guts of the male who perceives the male such a mechanism is impossible by natural selection period.
Medical science has it wrong. Poor personal eating habits have nothing to do with excessive body fat. All body fat --- all of it --- every single molecule of it is (or was) purposeful --- it has but one purpose and no other in humans --- that is to do exactly what it does completely and absolutely in every single living human --- it either attracts or it repels. In one conformation body fat attracts absolutely and in a different conformation it repels absolutely --- repels, repels, repels. All repulsive body fat is purposeful. It has (or had) an evolutionary purpose. It repels, repels, repels. It happens in the male's brain and nowhere else in the cosmos. A response like that can only occur if there's a molecular structure in the brain to cause it to occur and it cannot be Mendelian.
Natural selection could not have created it. There had to be a creator event to produce it,. Plasmo was that creator.
The bar code reader in the brain of the male made the necessary binary decisions out on the periphery of the species range. Beads drew the male traders out to the periphery and then the males came back with women the bar code reader selected for them. Very young women. Very young women with pretty faces, tiny round butts and incipient pubic hair --- what all males want in their secret dreams --- then as now.
The bar code reader would necessarily be a molecular structure of some sort that is alike in all human males.
The electronic chip in all motel 6 door locks in the United States Like Schrödinger's cat remains unseen but essentially works identically in all motel 6 door locks in the Untied States.
Similarly the bar code reader connected to a solenoid in the male brain must necessarily be a molecular structure that reads ugliness and prettiness repeatedly and unfailingly like all motel 6 electronic door locks read key cards repeatedly and unfailingly.
The genetics of this "chip" in the brain of all human males would necessarily be Mendelian, reading oldness/ youngness, drop dead beauty, dog shit ugliness, tight little butts and big fat asses unfailingly for the 55,000 thousand years since Plasmo first designed it.
Like Schrödinger's cat you can't see it in the male brain but like the unseen chip in the motel 6 door lock pictured right --- you know it has to be there
Plasmo designed that unseen chip in the male brain.
Plasmo used junk functions of the human brain to build her monster computer as big as the great basin.
Half the genes in a large percentage of all living organisms have no real purpose and are called 'junk genes'.
Photo by pixfolio/alamy
THE PECULIAR COLORATION IN THE CORN PICTURED ABOVE IS CAUSED BY COMPLETELY USELESS BUT HARMLESS JUNK DNA (JUMPING GENES --- DISCOVERED BY BARBARA McCLINTOCK IN THE 1950s I THINK).
Instead of using junk genes Plasmo used junk functions of the human prefrontal cortex to build the garment industry.
By junk brain functions we mean such self evident useless brain functions as music and art but also many others such as mild fascination with clearly useless but pretty objects such as feathers, pretty stones, sea shells, large animal incisors such as bear and shark teeth and especially vivid paints and pigments for body decoration, shiny rare metals and of course, fabrics. --- all these being relatively rare in the natural world and often found on the edge of the hominid species range.
Plasmo turned these useless but captivating junk objects into obsessive ‘must have’ items mostly to be used as body adornments then combined them with the common human proclivity to fashion and flair driving obsessive males to the edge of the species range to collect them as they often continue to do to this day.
No new brain functions were invented. Plasmo used only those junk brain functions that were already present in the brain --- magnified them --- and then sent specialist traders off to the edge of the species range looking for them knowing that the traders would often return with young females with pretty faces, tiny round butts and incipient pubic hair who carried the critical peripheral genes needed by both Plasmo and us for the two of us to survive a near catastrophic population crunch.
In other words we're saying that the distribution of talents and abilities on the surface of the human prefrontal cortex is as varied as the variation in that corn --- Plasmo did that --- and the only way to read it is through SAT scores. It's invisible to MRI scans.
Plasmo needed more functions for her monster macroprocessor than the brains of hominid species could provide. Back then the brains of all individuals were all identical (according to me). Plasmo needed more computer power than that. Much more. In addition she needed to have individuals with distinctly different roles in the system. Plasmo had to come up with something unique.
There are a number of modules on the SAT test., math, verbal, spatial etc.. No matter how many individuals take the test the results always show that the module vary individually the way coloration varies in the ears of Indian corn above. Nobody has the same mix of abilities.
Jumping genes cause the variation on the corn. To create the same effect in the human prefrontal cortex Plasmo used something different called random stuttering genes (triple repeats) which means exactly what it sounds like. The genes stutter. This greatly multiplied diverse functions of the brain greatly increasing the space of certain (but not all) discrete functions in the total population without increasing the size of individual brains.
Stuttering genes" means exactly what it sounds like. The genes stutter. That kind of variation is special. It's not Mendelian.
Think about it. If there were a gene for smartness and the gene stuttered it would produce more smartness every time the gene stuttered. Endlessly. Forever. The more stutters, the more smartness. Every time the gene stuttered you'd get smarter and smarter and smarter. They sky's the limit in this deal. It's a deal no population can turn down.
Stuttering repeats are responsible for a many neurodegenerative disorders including Huntington's disease and autism. Get the connection --- brain functions --- neurodegenerative disease --- SAT scores. They are all phenomena of the brain. Stuttering genes on discrete junk functions of the prefrontal cortex gave Plasmo the brain power she needed without increasing the size of individual brains.
With one simple key stroke Plasmo could easily double, triple or more than quadruple the effective circuitry or gigabyte level of the population without increasing the size of individual brains.
It's all done with the pull of a genetic slot machine handle.
You have a number of genes. Ten maybe. Each represents a different modular function spread out on the surface of the prefrontal cortex like ten distinctly different computer chips spread out on a table top. Each chip is rigorously limited in number of circuits by brain size. In the brain different individual functions would be such as music, math, memory, spatial, reading etc. (Math and reading were useless abilities 65,000 years ago.) Early in brain development a non Mendelian slot machine handle is pulled on each of the individual modules separately. Each module then comes up with its own unique number.
The outcome is all completely random. There's no heritability to it.
It's the same as having a handful of lottery tickets. Each ticket has a different combination of numbers on it. That's what you see on SAT scores.
Say you had 10 separate intellectual modules in each prefrontal cortex in a population that would mean 10 gigs for each individual and no more than 10 gigs for the population no matter how large it was because all brains are redundant. It could never be more than 10 gigs for the population no matter how large it was. The population has a limited IQ.
Now, if you distribute the abilities and talents on the surface of all the prefrontal cortices the way Indian corn coloration is distributed the gigs (IQ) goes up at the population level exponentially. They stay the same at the individual level.
Exponential means there's no limit to it. The sky's the limit. You can't stop a process like that.
This is just a simple engineering problem solved by Plasmo that any average engineer could come up with. How do you increase IQ of the population in a population in which each individual's prefrontal cortex is identical when the surface of each individual's cortex is critically limited?
The answer is, by distributing the circuits like the genetics of coloration in Indian corn.
The SAT scores are a paper map of variable circuits of this prefrontal variable cortex which differs in each individual. However it's not a complete map since only college bound students tend to take the test and many junk functions such as music and art are not included in the test. Like Schrödinger's cat, you can only infer it from outside the box. You don't have to get in side the brain to see it. Any asshole can see it through the simple results of SAT scores.
Plasmo's fateful keystroke was the true creation event of all modern humans. Prior to that keystroke all human brains were identical. After the keystroke all human brains were different the way Indian corn is different. Physicists call the big bang, "the singularity". That fateful keystroke was the singularity of human creation. By turning on the genetics of stuttering genes Plasmo had unintentionally created the variable human prefrontal cortex causing gigabytes (IQ) to rise at the population level exponentially without increasing the size of individual brains. Bestowing different gifts to different individuals by chance genetics giving rise to all the great civilizations you see in the world today.
Plasmo is now long gone from the scene.
That’s the computer as big as the Great basin. Plasmo invented it 65000 years ago to save our genetic bacon. It runs on like a perpetual motion machine with a start button but no stop button. Plasmo set the controls of commerce, long distance trade, the garment industry and male obsessive, relentless, irresolvable desire on wide open 65,000 years ago and set the whole thing in motion the way an arsonist sets a match to tinder in a dry forest during a wind storm. It rages on mindlessly to this day like a runaway train going downhill. Can anyone stop or slow it down? Does anyone care? Can it ever have a happy ending? A) I don’t know. B) I don’t give a fuck. C) I won’t be around for the ending.